<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The BIG Problem with Silverlight&#039;s Control Templating Model</title>
	<atom:link href="http://drwpf.com/blog/2008/03/24/the-big-problem-with-silverlights-control-templating-model/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://drwpf.com/blog/2008/03/24/the-big-problem-with-silverlights-control-templating-model/</link>
	<description>Drinking (and serving) the WPF Kool-Aid since 2002</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 01:06:24 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom McKearney</title>
		<link>http://drwpf.com/blog/2008/03/24/the-big-problem-with-silverlights-control-templating-model/comment-page-1/#comment-558</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom McKearney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 11:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drwpf.com/blog/?p=31#comment-558</guid>
		<description>I absolutely agree with you on this.  My colleagues who have only done Silverlight stuff don&#039;t understand what the problem is.  I went from WPF to Silverlight and it&#039;s been agonizing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I absolutely agree with you on this.  My colleagues who have only done Silverlight stuff don&#8217;t understand what the problem is.  I went from WPF to Silverlight and it&#8217;s been agonizing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Brown</title>
		<link>http://drwpf.com/blog/2008/03/24/the-big-problem-with-silverlights-control-templating-model/comment-page-1/#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drwpf.com/blog/?p=31#comment-289</guid>
		<description>Agreed, Silverlight desperately needs feature parity with WPF on the important things.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Keeping the size down is important, but not THAT important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, Silverlight desperately needs feature parity with WPF on the important things.</p>
<p>Keeping the size down is important, but not THAT important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Burke</title>
		<link>http://drwpf.com/blog/2008/03/24/the-big-problem-with-silverlights-control-templating-model/comment-page-1/#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Burke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 20:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drwpf.com/blog/?p=31#comment-288</guid>
		<description>YES! PLEASE! Cast my vote for property, data and event triggers. &lt;br&gt;/me too&lt;br&gt;/really</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YES! PLEASE! Cast my vote for property, data and event triggers. <br />/me too<br />/really</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://drwpf.com/blog/2008/03/24/the-big-problem-with-silverlights-control-templating-model/comment-page-1/#comment-287</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 14:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drwpf.com/blog/?p=31#comment-287</guid>
		<description>After playing with the beta for a few weeks, developing a control in Silverlight is like walking through mud.  I hope these following things get looked at: Inherited Styles, Property Triggers, Event Triggers(more than just Loaded), Routed Events, ICommand, Element binding. Coming from WPF I&#039;m not sure why the change in the model? I&#039;m still scratching my head over it. Silverlight is still lacking parity with its big brother, and its painful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After playing with the beta for a few weeks, developing a control in Silverlight is like walking through mud.  I hope these following things get looked at: Inherited Styles, Property Triggers, Event Triggers(more than just Loaded), Routed Events, ICommand, Element binding. Coming from WPF I&#8217;m not sure why the change in the model? I&#8217;m still scratching my head over it. Silverlight is still lacking parity with its big brother, and its painful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marlon Grech</title>
		<link>http://drwpf.com/blog/2008/03/24/the-big-problem-with-silverlights-control-templating-model/comment-page-1/#comment-286</link>
		<dc:creator>Marlon Grech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 00:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drwpf.com/blog/?p=31#comment-286</guid>
		<description>I am with you here.... Silverlight needs (MUST) to have the same Model as WPF.... The way I see it, WPF is a tried and tested approach that WORKS! It makes the Developer + Designer workflow a beauty... Why are we going to change it in Silverlight and re invent something else... It does not make any sense...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am with you here&#8230;. Silverlight needs (MUST) to have the same Model as WPF&#8230;. The way I see it, WPF is a tried and tested approach that WORKS! It makes the Developer + Designer workflow a beauty&#8230; Why are we going to change it in Silverlight and re invent something else&#8230; It does not make any sense&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Smith</title>
		<link>http://drwpf.com/blog/2008/03/24/the-big-problem-with-silverlights-control-templating-model/comment-page-1/#comment-285</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 20:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drwpf.com/blog/?p=31#comment-285</guid>
		<description>I have been yelling for triggers in SL2 for a while, too.  But the problems around templating are an unacceptable ramification of not having triggers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BTW - your comments about my Podder skin bwoke my wittle heart!  :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-Josh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been yelling for triggers in SL2 for a while, too.  But the problems around templating are an unacceptable ramification of not having triggers.</p>
<p>BTW &#8211; your comments about my Podder skin bwoke my wittle heart!  <img src='http://drwpf.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>-Josh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://drwpf.com/blog/2008/03/24/the-big-problem-with-silverlights-control-templating-model/comment-page-1/#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 05:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drwpf.com/blog/?p=31#comment-284</guid>
		<description>I totally agree, we need triggers in Silverlight!  In fact, I&#039;m holding out until Beta 2 to do any development in Silverlight in the hope that they are added in.  After using them alot in WPF, I don&#039;t want to have to re-work some of that code to get it going in Silverlight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree, we need triggers in Silverlight!  In fact, I&#8217;m holding out until Beta 2 to do any development in Silverlight in the hope that they are added in.  After using them alot in WPF, I don&#8217;t want to have to re-work some of that code to get it going in Silverlight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denis Vuyka</title>
		<link>http://drwpf.com/blog/2008/03/24/the-big-problem-with-silverlights-control-templating-model/comment-page-1/#comment-283</link>
		<dc:creator>Denis Vuyka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 00:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drwpf.com/blog/?p=31#comment-283</guid>
		<description>I think we all will be happy enough if there won&#039;t be any difference between Silverlight and WPF except renderers :) So my voice is not only for triggers but for eliminating the phrase &quot;subset of WPF&quot; for Silverlight at all. Guess this is what Silverlight team is working on at least from public point of view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we all will be happy enough if there won&#8217;t be any difference between Silverlight and WPF except renderers <img src='http://drwpf.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  So my voice is not only for triggers but for eliminating the phrase &#8220;subset of WPF&#8221; for Silverlight at all. Guess this is what Silverlight team is working on at least from public point of view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. WPF</title>
		<link>http://drwpf.com/blog/2008/03/24/the-big-problem-with-silverlights-control-templating-model/comment-page-1/#comment-282</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. WPF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 10:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drwpf.com/blog/?p=31#comment-282</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Jer! You just reminded me... There&#039;s a new episode of &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.hbo.com/films/johnadams/&quot;&gt;John Adams&lt;/a&gt; on tonight.  Nice!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Jer! You just reminded me&#8230; There&#8217;s a new episode of <a target="_blank" href="http://www.hbo.com/films/johnadams/">John Adams</a> on tonight.  Nice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Eisenberg</title>
		<link>http://drwpf.com/blog/2008/03/24/the-big-problem-with-silverlights-control-templating-model/comment-page-1/#comment-280</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Eisenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 09:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drwpf.com/blog/?p=31#comment-280</guid>
		<description>Preach it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Preach it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
